For one thing, the American media likes throwing around “Right
Wing” as some sort of profanity towards whomever they do not like at the
moment, without any relation to social or economic positions of the person they
are calling Right Wing. The “Left Wing”
has evaporated into a bunch of nicie-nicie descriptions centered around “reasonableness”.
Just think about it for a moment. Are tobacco smoking bans ever called “Right Wing”? Every other ingestion prohibition measure is
called Right Wing, but not tobacco smoking.
As any educated person should know, tobacco prohibitions were instituted
by the Germans under Hitler and took a while to arrive in America. National Socialists, especially Nazis, are
called “Right Wing” when every single National Socialist regime was barely distinguishable
from Communists, who are considered “Left Wing.”
When the media, or even your professors who are teaching
subjects well removed from politics, mention “Right Wing” they describe imaginary
fatcat social conservatives who want to spy on you in your bedroom. When they describe anybody else, it is in
nice reasonable terms. Reasonable people
who don’t want government intrusion in the bedroom, or in their smoking
material, who advocate mountains of laws, regulation, and spending while
calling it freedom.
So in the interest of sanity, I will use the Left vs. Right dynamic of statist on the
Left and anti-statist on the Right.
Pretty simple. People who want
to keep other adults from putting whatever they like into their bodies,
including tobacco, are Leftist. People
who want the government to leave them alone are Rightist.
The Left is populated by those who oppose free markets, the
Right is composed of people who embrace free markets, including the abolishment
of anti-trust laws.
The union issue? Both
sides can support the existence of trade unions, but the Left seeks legislated advantage
for either side of the negotiation. The Right wants the government to stay out
of it, other than protecting private property.
Ah yes, the police power of the state. Both sides agree that the government should
use police power to protect the rights of people, they just seem to disagree on
just what those rights are. As for the
details, keep watching the blog to keep tabs on my writing progress.
No comments:
Post a Comment