Yes, of course he was. Now that I have your attention, the real question is: How can anybody think that Lenin, Stalin and Mao were not bad, or even half bad? It has to do with marketing, called propaganda when it comes from the government.
 |
| Hitler bad |
As I have mentioned before in
Socialists and Marketing, the Socialist is under the impression that every consumer choice is made due to some marketing campaign. An additional thought now is that Socialists, and Leftists in general, are particularly susceptible to advertising. It does explain the actions of the Bloombergs, Obamas, and Ayers of the world quite nicely. Whatever they decide is right and proper is always accompanied by a massive marketing blitz, along with attempts to silence any opposition to their "we are doing it for you" do-goodery.
 |
| Stalin not so bad? |
What does this have to do with Hitler? Everything, actually. With
one edict, Stalin turned his Socialist kinsman,
atheist Germanic Pagan, vegetarian,
cigarette hating, industry nationalizing, frustrated artist into a
Right-Winger. Stalin's order, that Communism was "Left" and everything else was "Right" went out to the Communist true-believers in the "commanding heights of society" to echo for centuries. In 1928, not even Social Democrats were "Left" enough for Stalin:
Hence the tasks of the Communist Parties:
Firstly, to wage an unceasing struggle against Social-Democratism in all spheres -- in the economic and in the political sphere, including in the latter the exposure of bourgeois pacifism with the task of winning the majority of the working class for communism.
Secondly, to form a united front of the workers of the advanced countries and the labouring masses of the colonies in order to stave off the danger of war, or, if war breaks out, to convert imperialist war into civil war, smash fascism, overthrow capitalism, establish Soviet power, emancipate the colonies from slavery, and organise all-round defence of the first Soviet Republic in the world.
Such are the principal problems and tasks confronting the Sixth Congress.
These problems and tasks are being taken into account by the Executive Committee of the Comintern, as you will easily see if you examine the agenda of the Sixth Congress of the Comintern.
 |
| An adorable Mao? |
Stalin was in a squabble about Socialist competition and a few years later, he was executing folks like Trotsky, not because they were free-market capitalists, but because they were not Communist enough, especially as their followings grew. Note the beginnings of the conflagration of
fascist. Stalin lumped the Fascists of Italy in with the Nazis of Germany, whirled the red blender and they became one-in-the-same for the rest of Leftwing history.
Any lie was fine after that, like this one:
Not until Germany’s tanks were on the borders of England and France did those governments ‘switch’ sides: now it was their imperialist domination being threatened. Bolding mine, least anybody miss the detail of absurdity that Socialists toss about.
In their attempts to draw a distinction between the "real" Socialists and those fake National Socialists, the Communist hive came up with a neat little checklist aimed at the National Socialists. One little problem with that, it describes the Soviet system to perfection. Quoting just the first point here, the rest is just as comical.
There are several fundamental characteristics of fascism, among them are:
1. Right Wing: Fascists are fervently against: Marxism, Socialism, Anarchism, Communism, Environmentalism; etc – in essence, they are against the progressive left in total, including moderate lefts (social democrats, etc). Fascism is an extreme right wing ideology, though it can be opportunistic.
 |
| Meanie Mussolini? |
Sure, all of these
leftist parties are rivals with each other, the same way Republicans and Democrats in America. The same way that allies Hitler and Mussolini faced off against each other in France, at the beginning. But National Socialists (fascists in the text) are anti-Environmentalism vs. Communists/Socialists as grand stewards of the earth? Sounds good on paper, but in reality the Soviet Union, and later China, North Korea, Haiti and Cuba, all
destroyed the environment they controlled in rates and volumes unparalleled in all of human history. Meanwhile, the German National Socialists institutionalized their Environmentalist Movement before and during WWII, called
Reichsnaturschutzgesetz (RNG, Reich Nature Protection Law).
Of course, the marketing campaign that only a Socialist could fall for does not end there and what has been referenced above does not explain why Hitler, a murderer of
12 million people can overshadow Stalin, a
murderer of 20 million, or for that matter Mao, a
murderer of 77 million as the worst human in history. Arguably, the runner up behind Hitler should be Lenin, with his Cheka murders knocking off about
0.5 million and intentional famine starving millions more. They are all bad, all horrible pieces of disgusting human filth. But not to the Left, who like to sport t-shirts with images like this:
 |
| Heroes of the Left have the highest body counts. |
It all goes back to Stalin's
Third Period Declaration of 1928. Once the Socialists get an order, the large portion who take their marching orders from Moscow directly or indirectly, they follow it to any extreme. After Hitler and Mussolini were declared "bad", for being more popular internationally than Stalin and nothing else, the professors, and other writers populating the commanding heights of society, set to work with a "Stalin good/Hitler bad" narrative that continues today.
Still not convinced? Ever hear of
Alexander Solzhenitsyn? He was a Gulag survivor who wrote a few good books. However, not until Soviet leader Khrushchev made a
secret speech could his books about the Gulag could be published. At least the speech was supposed to be a secret.
Israeli intelligence furnished the US Central Intelligence agency a copy, they in turn furnished the
New York Times a copy and
it was published. Immediate
howling ensued from the true believers of Soviet Socialism, they likened any criticism of Stalin to "
spots on the sun", partly because the news came from
somewhere besides Moscow. Eventually Moscow did own up to it, but the speech was either ignored or used as evidence by Western Communists that Khrushchev destroyed communism.
No, Hitler's reputation as "worst ever" certainly has nothing to do with genocide, murder, or intentional starvation. The people of Finland, the Balkan States and Taiwan can attest that it has nothing to do with "totalitarianism" either. It is due to marketing of the worst kind.
/ˌkæviːɑːt ˈɛmptɔr/) or buyer beware. It does not only apply to purchasing real property, it is especially valuable for the purchase of personal property, like truffles.
