Asians For Sale! The New York Times Suggests A Price For Asian Women (And Men)

Updated 12 JAN 2012 with video (at bottom).

The price that the New York Times is urging the Obama administration to sell the people of Taiwan to mainland China for is $49,793.8708 per person. The only thing Leftists, including their Communist faction, care about is money.  In this case, the New York Times agitates for selling almost 23 Million people into slavery for the  sum of $1.14 trillion.  If you think the NYT is trying to deflect criticism by sticking a former Marine on this topic, you are probably right.  That is another favorite tactic of the Left, see John F. Kerry (he served in Vietnam) and others.

Slaver Paul V. Kane

Op-Ed Contributor
To Save Our Economy, Ditch Taiwan
By PAUL V. KANE
Published: November 10, 2011

 . . .  There are dozens of initiatives President Obama could undertake to strengthen our economic security. Here is one: He should enter into closed-door negotiations with Chinese leaders to write off the $1.14 trillion of American debt currently held by China in exchange for a deal to end American military assistance and arms sales to Taiwan and terminate the current United States-Taiwan defense arrangement by 2015.

This would be a most precious prize to the cautious men in Beijing, one they would give dearly to achieve. After all, our relationship with Taiwan, as revised in 1979, is a vestige of the cold war.. . .

The NYT vision of Taiwan's future.

That was just the money quote.  More at the link. So the New York Times, along with this former Marine of indeterminate rank, have placed the price of $49,793.8708 on the lives and livelihoods of 22,894,384 living people, with a proposal to sell them into the slavery of Communism.

Yes, the same New York Times that employs Thomas Friedman, regular agitator for the mainland Chinese version of "capitalism", which resembles most closely the National Socialism of Adolph Hitler, with a higher death toll.

What has happened since the days of 1863 when Henry Raymond manned a Gatling Gun to defend the paper against rioting pro-slavery Democrats?  Nothing good, I assure you.

Update: I do not recognize Paul V. Kane in this video, allegedly of Marines urinating on corpses in Afghanistan.  I am not yet convinced that it is authentic either.

If you want to piss on corpses, piss on these.

Sexy Chicken: If You Are Looking For A Sexy Woman Posed For Eating, Seek Dolcett Not The NYT

In response to the emails (two total) concerning the dryness of this blog, I am giving in with a comment on the Sexy Chicken controversy .

The New York Times recently ran a story about chicken eating with this image:

Those wild cats in media find the above image to be "unusually provocative", only proving once again that words have no meaning to these people.

On cue, PETA became outraged:

“It’s down-right offensive, not just to people who care about animals but almost to everyone. It’s a plucked, beheaded, young chicken in a young pose.” - Ingrid Newkirk

There is a lesson here.  The Socialist, above all, is against things and rarely for anything, other than forcing other people to bow to the whims of the Socialist that change with the seasons.  Just browse through a few articles by folk who are self identified social liberals and how they describe the chicken picture.  Sexy, erotic, sensual . . . It does not even look like it is oiled up!

Something PETA, the New York Times, Greenpeace, and others have in common is a hatred for American industry and the free choice of people to buy from industry.  However, they do love certain things so they look the other way when their particular choice is supplied by an industry.  In this case, they all find themselves looking the other way and right at each other.  One group does not want us to eat a healthy, omnivore diet, another wants food to be chased down for consumption rather than grown on farms (the free range advocates), yet another has a fit if we use fire.

As for describing the chicken as posed like a sexy woman prepared for eating and cooking as some sort of corporate carnivore propaganda designed to lure the otherwise vegan natured human into sins of the flesh, I submit that Dolcett images are a lot closer to those descriptions: